The Misadventures of Quinxy truths, lies, and everything in between!


My Treadmill Desk: Week 1

treadmill_deskLast week I set up a treadmill desk.  I've gained more pounds than I'd like to admit over the last couple of years, trying to eat my way out of unhappiness, combined with a move that placed me far away from the healthier eating-out food options I used to enjoy (and far closer to the sinister ones).

I had years ago heard about people using treadmill desks and had always meant to give it a try.   As I am at my computer 14 hours a day or so the ability to turn some of that time into a workout was very appealing.  For my recent birthday I bought myself a LifeSpan TR 1200i Folding Treadmill with the goal of using it in a treadmill desk setup.  A few companies now make treadmills specifically for use with a desk, some even include the desk, and LifeSpan does in fact make a treadmill for these purposes, the LifeSpan TR1200-DT3 Standing Desk Treadmill (no desk included).  As I compared the features of LifeSpan's desk-flavored treadmill with their regular treadmill I became convinced that I'd be far better off converting their traditional treadmill to desk use.  The non-desk version costs the exact same amount ($999) but includes a number of really powerful features: a) variable incline 0 - 15 degrees), b) pulse rate monitor (in handrails or via chest strap), c) fancier programs (since it uses incline and pulse monitor), and d) it includes running speeds (0.5 - 10 mph, instead of 0.4 - 4 mph). The only feature you seem to lose is some sort of bluetooth ability, which I didn't really investigate.  Otherwise they appear identical in terms of specs.

All I had to do to convert the non-desk version to one I could use with my desk was remove the vertical portion of the treadmill, which involved removing a few bolts and pulling the console's cable out so I could re-run the cable to the console which I had now mounted on my desk with double sided foam tape.  Easy-peasy.  And I bought the chest strap ($40) so I could get constant heart rate monitoring without needing to hold onto hand rails; originally I was going to remount the hand rails to my desk, but the chest strap is a far more elegant solution.

For the desk I use my much loved Ikea Jerker, a design Ikea never should have retired (anyone who wants one and lives near a major metropolitan area can find one on Craigslist for $75 - 100).  I set up a second Ikea Jerker desk to the left of my treadmill desk with a monitor, keyboard, and mouse so when I want to sit in a normal chair I can just work there (using RDP).  The idea was to virtually force myself to use the treadmill desk as I would do almost anything to avoid using this tiny single monitor and less familiar keyboard when I could be using my three monitor setup with my normal keyboard/mouse, but to permit me a fallback when I needed it.  The other side of that is that I actually would rather walk than stand, I find standing less comfortable, so as long as I'm standing, I'm highly likely to walk.

After the first few days I discovered that my fall back desk with tiny monitor really wasn't such a brilliant idea.  I need to be on my computer 14 or so hours every day and it's just never going to be realistic for me to walk all 14 hours.  And since I was just starting back into an exercise routine and needed time for my body to adjust I'm doing about 2 - 3 hours walking a day, and using that tiny little monitor and unfamiliar keyboard just wasn't cutting it, my productivity plummeted.  I would either work slowly or completely avoid doing things on the computer, suddenly wanting to organize, clean things, etc.  I needed another solution...  and this is when I made my treadmill chair!

SONY DSCYears ago I bought a pair of those fantastic aluminum stools that Crate and Barrel was kind enough to knock off.  I bought it for my MAME arcade machine, which is currently in storage.  It was the perfect height to place on top of the treadmill so that I could use my regular setup without standing.  The problem was, I didn't want to damage the treadmill belt, and it seemed inevitable that distributing my weight down to those four thin aluminum legs was a recipe for disaster.  I'm sure the belt would have been fine for a while, but it certainly would have accelerated its deterioration.  But what material would be safe to use against a treadmill belt, to allow me to distribute the weight better?  Wood?  Metal?  Cardboard?  Shoes!  If there's anything that a treadmill was meant to have on it, it's shoes!  So I ran down to Walmart and bought two pairs of fake converse shoes for $12 a pair and made wooden inserts for the shoes onto which I attached the stool legs (via hot glue gun).  And it works perfectly!

Now I can use my treadmill for walking and whenever I need take a break on my treadmill chair.

I've been using the setup for about a week now and I must say I am encouraged. The first couple of days I walked about 2 hours, then I took a day off because my legs were hurting, and the next couple of days I've been doing about 2.5 - 3 hours a day. One issue has been trying to figure out what the right speed is. For the first few days I was at 1.5 mph, then I bumped it up to about 2.0 to 2.5 mph for the last few days, and am finding the speed I can do relates quite a bit to the work I need to do. Trying to operate a mouse with precision in a graphic design package at 2.5 mph isn't something I can yet do. This is where the incline is particularly nice, and why I'm very happy I got a treadmill with incline. If I need to dial down the speed I can always increase the incline to make sure I'm still getting a good workout. Right now to write this I'm doing 1.8 mph and a 5 degree incline, instead of 2.8 mph and a 0 degree incline. The CDC says you need to be going at least 3 mph for a healthy fast walking exercise, but that is still a little beyond my abilities to do while using my computer.

Only time will tell if this is a lasting solution to my problem of being too sedentary.

^ Quinxy


Sketchup Hanging on Start? Disable OpenGL Acceleration via Registry

My Sketchup 2013 copy suddenly stopped working right. First it would hang if I tried to add a scene, then it just hang and race the processor once it started up. I tried all the latest drivers for my AMD Radeon 7800M, but no change.

I knew I could at least run Sketchup if I could disable the use of OpenGL hardware acceleration.

The registry key that you need to modify is in this registry branch:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SketchUp\SketchUp 2013\Preferences

Modify this registry key:

And make it now equal to 0 (it's of type REG_DWORD)


Sketchup should now start!

Of course it'll perform very poorly if you're working with a big/complex model and you're using "View > Face Style > Shaded" or  "View > Face Style > Shaded with Textures" so remember you can switch to "View > Face Style > Wireframe" when you can get by without seeing the faces and textures because that will still perform very well.

Working without the hardware acceleration is better than not being able to use Sketchup at all.  Not sure if my problem is truly a driver problem as Tremble/Sketchup would have me believe or if it's a bug in Sketchup.

^ Quinxy

Tagged as: No Comments

Criss Angel Ruins Magic

I don't like magician Criss Angel... I dislike him in the same way I dislike Lance Armstrong and other cheaters. I think Criss Angel damages magic as an art. He has created tricks which rely on stooges and camera tricks. He "cheats", crossing many lines other magicians do not. He does it for the same reason all cheaters do it, to get more money, more fame. And the public's expectation shift as they see more and more cheating in magic, and it creates an environment in which magic suffers. Magic stops being about, "How do I operate within these generally recognized, user observable rules (where an audience member could be there in person instead of behind a TV screen) and still create mystery and wonder?" Criss Angel might as well teleport himself onto the ISS (space station) in a televised trick, his methods make that just as possible and easy as other tricks he has done on TV; but of course he doesn't do that as a trick because then people would instantly recognize the nonsense of many of his tricks. He does, of course, do quite a bit of stuff without camera edits and stooges (his Las Vegas stage magic, presumably), so I'm not suggesting he's not a capable magician, just why I find him and his origin story so flawed.

I should say that I'm not a magician, and I wouldn't even consider myself a huge fan of magic (though I enjoy it), but I recognize its art and ingenuity and don't like seeing it spoiled. And this isn't one of those live and let live issues, where people can simply vote with their entertainment dollars and let the marketplace decide. Whether I see his show or not, he does his damage, which is why I think there is value in people loudly disliking him.

^ Q


LinkedIn: How I Grew My Network Fast, from 30 to 1300 Connections in Only 14 days

linkedin__1217linkedinAs part of my combination job search and software project promotion I've made it my goal to revitalized my my LinkedIn network.  I signed up 7 years ago but just never used it.  I began with a very modest ~30 connections and within 14 days I reached 1300 1st degree connections, all with minimal effort.  Let me share with you the "magic" of how I did it.

But first, a major caveat.  Creating a big network requires you to accept the axiom put forward by Will Rogers that, “A stranger is just a friend I haven't met yet.”  The premise of LinkedIn, and most social media sites,  is that you create your network to reflect your real world relationships, and while that would be nice, the reality is that it's never going to happen.  The boundaries of human relationships are fuzzy -- the line between friends, acquaintances, long lost acquaintances, and friendly strangers is blurry.  And people, being naturally social, always seek to make new friends, new acquaintances for personal and professional reasons.  So, if your LinkedIn policy is to limit your network to only people you truly know, then your network will likely be and remain fairly small.  Dunbar's number is a theorized number suggesting humans can only maintain a real cognitive connection with 100-250 others.  As most people do not have thousands and thousands of people they directly know well in real life to invite, if you want a larger network you will need to make connections with friends you haven't met yet.

Invite Your Real World Connections First

Before you begin trying to expand your network with people you may not know, first make sure to spend a few days to a week connecting with those you do know, using LinkedIn's recommendations to allow you to find all those connections which you may not initially directly have access to or remember.  For example, you may remember a coworker John A. at the last company you worked for, but not remember anyone else.  But once John A. accepts your invite LinkedIn will start to suggest the names of others who worked there, too.  This will jog your memory and you can reconnect with those others, and keep expanding your real world connections out in this manner.  Once you embark on adding virtual connections the usefulness of the recommendation system will quickly drop to zero and you'll likely never see another useful real world recommendation again!  So make sure you do this first!

Do Not Invite (Just Any) Random Strangers

It is critical that you do not spam random strangers with LinkedIn requests.  Your LinkedIn account will be suspended!  When anyone receives a LinkedIn invite they have three options: Accept, Archive, or I Don't Know. Accept means just what you think it does.  Archive means do not accept the invite, but file it away so I don't see it any more.  "I Don't Know" theoretically means "I Don't Know [this Person in Real Life]", but what it really means is "I Don't [Want to] Know [this Person]".  If you have too many people say "I Don't Know" then your account will be suspended.  So it is very important you do not invite those who will "I Don't Know" you.  Fortunately a great many friendly strangers within LinkedIn do want to know you and indicate as such in their profiles, a common acronym for these people is LION (LinkedIn Open Network), you will see it in their name line and in their profiles.  But just because they say LION does not necessarily mean they will not "I Don't Know" (IDK) you.  While most LIONs will NOT IDK you, some may use the LION phrase without appreciating what it implies, and others may simply not accept what it implies.  So the way to stay safe is to look in their profile for a phrase like, "I never IDK."  If you're going to invite a friend you haven't met yet, make sure they never IDK!

Indicate your Openness in your Profile

Now that you know about LIONs and IDKs, you can put those elements in your summary and you will see an increase in the number of incoming invitations to connect you will get.  You are saying you are open for others to invite you, and they will.  But this alone will not get you many connections fast.  Your profile is just too invisible.  At best you might get a slow trickle of 0-2 invites a day just by including these things in your summary/profile.

You may wish to remove these indicators from your profile later, once you feel you have enough connections.  I can only assume that many people make judgments based on whether a profile seems more populated by real world connections or virtual ones, and putting LION or IDK in your profile may may lower your profile's perceived value to those people.

Boost Your Visibility by Joining Groups

LinkedIn allows people to see the detailed profiles of others when they are 1st degree connections, 2nd degree connections, or share group membership.  This last item is very important.  If you join a group of 15,000 you have effectively grown your network by that many people, you become more visible to them and they to you.  I recommend joining as many groups as reasonable to your interests, favoring the larger groups (each group indicates how many members are in it and how active it is, there is little value in joining a group of 150 people who have no active conversations).

Join LION (and related) Groups

If your goal is to make friends fast one key is to join LION-related groups.  Almost all of them have posts which are purely there for the purpose of making friends.  The way it works is someone creates a post and says, "Let's network, post your email as a comment!" and people do just that.  The comment threads are often 2,000+ comments long, which means (roughly, there are repeats) 2,000 people are indicating an interest to befriend anyone, and sharing their email address so that you can invite them.

I won't detail the process, but generally speaking here is how you can use these posts/comments if you so choose.

Step 1: Expand entire comment section.  

Keep expanding all the comment pages in the given post.  As you scroll down it will keep expanding the content, until every so often it requires that you click "SHOW MORE COMMENTS".  Keep repeating until you run out or get tired.

Step 2: Copy or save the HTML of that post and the shown comments.

Step 3: Extract the email addresses.

With the content of the page you can now extract the emails into a nice clean list.  You can use online tools to do this (such as this one), your favorite text editor (using regular expression), or other tools.

Step 4: Import your email address list into LinkedIn Contact List.

linkedin_add_contactThe next step will be to send a message to all these people saying that you too would like to connect.  To do this you need to import their email addresses into LinkedIn's contact list.  If you have any contacts already in that list you should delete them, otherwise how will you know who is who?  Deleting is a pain because the contact list only lets you delete in small batches (under ~100?)  otherwise you get an error.

linkedin_add_contact_2Once you have cleared your contact list, it's time to import the new one.  For that click the add contact icon in the top right and then on the page that follows choose the upload contact list option, seen highlighted in the screen capture.  Then just give it your big list of emails.

Step 5: Contact your Contacts!  

Now that the contacts are in the list you need to select them, choose a custom message, and invite them.  I strongly recommend the message you choose reference how you found them and why you are connecting.  Something like, "I found your email listed on the [Insert Name of Original Post] thread as someone interested in more connections, I would like to add you as mine.  Thanks."  And you'll need to repeat this quite a few times because they don't let you email to all at once.  I did it by letter, first all the As, then the Bs, etc.

And voila, the connections will begin to come pouring in.  But keep in mind, having connections doesn't alone do very much for you!  You'll need to begin posting, interacting, etc. to leverage the network you build.

NOTE: LinkedIn imposes a fixed limit on outgoing invites (I believe it is 3,000), so once you hit that limit you won't be able to invite any more people.  Others can still invite you, though.  You can contact customer service to try and get your limit raised but they may not accommodate you.  From what I have read they look at your activity and ratios for IDKing, etc.  And withdrawing invites from your InMail Sent folder does not restore invite credits. 

Update: A week later and I'm now at 2,000 connections.  There has been a steady stream of acceptances since my initial invite distribution, and a subsequent smaller one of about 600 seemed to keep the connections coming.  It remains to be seen just how useful this network will prove to be, to what use I can put it in the promotion of myself, my projects, etc.  I suspect it will have severely limited potential in those respects.

^ Q


The N-Word as Used by Whites


Recently celebrity chef Paula Deen was forced to admit she had used the N-word multiple times in the past.  She denied being a racist and seemed to excuse the behavior as  as being done a) a long time ago, b) at least once in reference to an African-American who put a gun to her head in a bank robbery.

Whether it's Mel Gibson hurling abuse at Jewish people, Michael Richards peppering black comedy patrons with the N-word, or Paula Deen venting to her husband about the terror she felt, the explanations given always insist that they would ordinarily never use such language, but that it was a freak event, that they were under extreme provocation, and that, therefore, they are not really racist.  Their position is indefensible.  The insulting words spring to their lips because they are racist, not because the situation inspired the use of those words.

My own interactions with people of color have not always been positive.  I have been a victim of a home robbery committed by an African-American.  And I've been stalked/harassed over months by a separate African-American.  But their skin color was not dominant in my thoughts about why they were a perpetrator and why I was their victim.  One of the perpetrators was a homeless drug addict looking for money for a fix and the other a homeless person with serious mental problems who believed I was living in *his* house.  But never did I find the N-word springing to my lips.  I genuinely cannot imagine why on Earth it would.  I have had ample positive experiences involving people of color that I cannot imagine any provocation sufficient to cause me to reduce an entire diverse race of people down to one ugly, monstrous word.  The N-word couldn't form on my lips because it doesn't ring true in my ears.  If you have ever known one great black person, how could you ever reduce any experience with another black person down to his/her color?

I am a at least a generation removed from most of the celebrities who get caught using the N-word, they grew up in less integrated times, grew up in more (arguably) ignorant times, grew up in more isolated surroundings so perhaps my environment saved me from their thinking.

I surely hold many subtle prejudices which I do not adequately appreciate; I think we humans are almost all of us naturally biased by experience and environment.  But I am thankful that I am not so lost as to find the N-word in my thoughts or speech.

^ Q

Tagged as: 1 Comment

More LinkedIn Connections Doesn’t Mean More LinkedIn Profile Views

linkedin__1217linkedinI was a bit surprised to realize just how uncorrelated the number of first degree LinkedIn connections and the number LinkedIn profile page views can be.

My profile views are quite low (~7/day), with at least half of that coming from people I'm sending invites to.  At best I might be getting 2 or 3 visits/day which are effectively unsolicited (coming in from search/etc.).  And yet according to LinkedIn's "How You Rank"  my modest 200+ connections profile is getting more profile views than people with hundreds of times more connections, specifically people with 29,500+, 20,000+, 7,500+, 6,000+,  4,000+ first degree connections.

Those insanely connected users are clearly heavily invested in their LinkedIn account profile, many of them have hundreds of skill endorsements, dozens of recommendations, and their profiles are rich in detail some even including clips from them presenting at this or that event.  And yet I have more profile views.  Which certainly strongly suggests that simply having billions of connections and a thorough and fully endorsed/recommended profile isn't much use in driving traffic to your profile.  I had expected people that many connections and those LinkedIn credentials would be highly favored in LinkedIn's search and thus would inherit quite a few daily profile views, but not necessarily so.

The recommendation people make about being active in the LinkedIn news feed comments and in groups in order to get profile views would seem to be perhaps the only way to generate correlated activity on your profile.

Update: It's two weeks later now and last week I had 216 profile views last week (31/day).  Most of these I suspect were from people who I had invited checking out my profile.  This activity has been enough to put me in the top 2% of profile views from people in my network (#36 out of 1910).  Many of those in my network appear to be powerhouse social media users, so ranking above them certainly further suggest that even the most socially active people do not see large volumes of LinkedIn profile views.  I'll be curious to learn how many residual hits a day I get as my campaign of friendliness winds down, they would then be coming through search and LinkedIn comment activity.

^ Q


A Bad Vegetarian’s List of Edible Vegetables

Vibrant Produce

I'm a bad vegetarian.  My diet is somewhat limited by peculiarly specific taste/texture dislikes which exclude most vegetables.

The only ones I can eat are:

  • Carrots
  • Peas
  • Potatoes
  • Sweet Potatoes
  • Green Beans
  • Black beans
  • Brown beans
  • Corn
  • Lentil
  • Sun-dried tomatoes
  • Soy beans (not a huge fan, but I can eat them)
  • Chick peas (not a huge fan, but I can eat them)
  • Squash (only in soups with lots of bread available)
  • Onions (in small pieces and in certain situations)
  • Peppers  (in small pieces and in certain situations)
  • Tomatoes (in small pieces and in certain situations)
  • Celery (only in soup)
  • Mushrooms (only tiny dried pieces in Stroganoff/etc.)
  • Avocado (only in very small amounts in burritos/etc.)
  • Spinach (only in very small amounts in certain situations)
  • Chives (in small pieces and in certain situations)
  • Parsley (in small pieces and in certain situations)
  • Garlic

That being said, I can eat other vegetables in very limited/special situations, generally involving minute amounts in some foreign food.  For example, I can eat a vegetable fried egg roll as long as I don't dwell on the contents (if I were to open up the egg roll and try to eat it from the plate that would be a great challenge).

I wonder how common peculiar food issues are.

^ Q


Cruelly Ephemeral Knowingness

I don't know how to truly cope with the experience of gaining then losing knowledge.  Knowing that I graduated fifteen years ago with a degree in mechanical engineering and now retain at best 5% of that knowledge makes my recent return to school for a Master of Business Administration (MBA) feel frighteningly useless.  I'm slightly accustomed to the month to month ebb and flow of knowledge (like 6 months ago I was on top of C# but now I'm off my game there and now on top of JavaScript), but signing up to devote years studying something only to know you'll forget the vast majority of it soon thereafter (much lost even before you graduate) really troubles me.  Obviously what I need to be convinced of is that, (for example) though my detailed knowledge of engineering and related maths are seemingly gone it could be revived reasonably quickly should the need arise.  And I'm just not entirely convinced of that.  I'm not convinced that it wouldn't make just as much sense to take a Cliff's Notes' version of courses and then be exposed to the details when and if you actually need them in your career.  But, presumably that wouldn't work, you need to temporarily comprehend the details in order to temporarily comprehend the stuff upon which its built which you need so that in the fullness of time you will at least remember those weathered/eroded pillars of learning.  I intellectually accept that most people experience this phenomena, but it feels like such a very personal cruelty, it's hard not to imagine it only happens to me.

^ Quinxy
(Originally in a letter to a friend.)

Rack2-Filer Smart is a Terrible, Awful, No Good Upgrade – Don’t Do It!

See below for details on recent, important update which makes this software almost as good as it used to be!

I've always had a love hate relationship with PFU's (Fujitsu's) Rack2-Filer.  I love that it is a computer-based alternative to a real/non-portable filing cabinet, but I hate that it has always striven to be nothing more than exactly that.  Where other companies might have rethought what it means to store and access virtual documents and delivered a bevvy of features to make that experience brilliant, PFU created a bewilderingly crippled experience almost as bad as real life.  The interface was a virtual cabinet with virtual shelves on which go virtual binders.  They mind-numbingly impose real and hard limits on how many virtual pages you can put in a binder, how many binders go on a shelf, how many shelves go in a cabinet.  Still...  as awful as it is, and it is awful, there is a certain strange, agreeable functionality about it all.

5-28-2013 8-39-54 PM 5-28-2013 8-41-24 PM

PFU recently released Rack2-Filer Smart as a replacement for Rack2-Filer.  I was eager to upgrade because one of the biggest offenses of the older product was its inability to be accessed from other devices, like Android or iOS tablets.  When I saw that Rack2-Filer Smart apps showed up in the app stores and realized you needed to upgrade your desktop client to use it I wanted to upgrade (I also prayed they would improve their software).  Ugh.  Upgrading was not a good decision.

PFU (a Fujitsu company) is just about the most incompetent software company I've ever encountered.  They are mired in stupid.  Whatever they might do right, however many brilliant people they might have, they've got just enough horribly inept and stupid people to ensure that their success will be forever limited.

The first major problem I encountered was that they provided trial links on their site to download and try out the Rack2-Filer Smart software but no buy links.  I even installed the trial thinking it would have buy links.  It did not.  There is no way to buy a downloadable version of their software online, despite them letting you download a trial.  That's pretty stupid.  Then I went searching for a physical version to buy.  As I own the old version and don't want to throw my money away I looked for and found an upgrade version on their and other e-commerce sites.  All "unavailable"/"sold out".  There were no copies to be had anywhere.  Huh?  I could buy they full version but no upgrade version.  I even checked eBay and found nothing.  A week or two later eBay let me know that someone was now selling Rack2-Filer Smart on eBay, and I got a full  (non-upgrade) copy for what seems now the going rate of $59 (presumably a copy included with a Fujitsu scanner sale).

5-28-2013 8-40-46 PM 5-28-2013 8-40-18 PM

And thus began my unpleasant experience with Rack2-Filer Smart...

First the import of my previous libraries failed.  One of the 49 cabinets it was trying to import would fail without any sort of useful message.  It suggested my drive might be full or there were file permission issues.  It took me an hour but by a process of elimination and guesstimation I worked out that it couldn't read it's own damn .ini file format, there was some OCR text in the OCR text section of the .ini that must have been causing some problem.  I removed the OCR section from that .ini and it would now import.  Stupid PFU.

With Rack2-Filer Smart now working the real horror began.  They seem to have rewritten everything, and in their rush to get it out decided to leave out tons of very useful features that people like me surely relied upon.  And, adding insult to injury, they decided to go all skeumorphy  and try and pretty up this pig of a program by slapping some lipstick on it in the form of photo-realistic shelf backgrounds and binder spines.

Here is my list of seriously horrible things they've changed/done in this latest release:

  • No more index sheet as the first page in a binder.  You now need to click to pop-open a list of sections.
  • No more drag and drop re-ordering of divider sections from the aforementioned index sheet, and the aforementioned pop-open list of sections has no drag and drop.  The nearest thing you can do is use the thumbnail view in the pop-open window to select, cut, and paste the items.  Works, but it requires a lot more clicking.  You'll see.  It's awful.
  • When you open the Binder Viewer it isn't maximized by default, and when you maximize it it doesn't bother zooming the display, so you've got your binder and its pages un-readably small on a normal sized modern screen.  No setting to fix this.  Idiotic. It means I have to click maximize and then the fill double-page view buttons every single time I open a binder.
  • Binder tabs are now useless.  The old version was pretty good about letting you see the tabs of adjacent divider sheets.  This new version is horrible, instead of dynamically placing the tabs the new version has only five spots for them, so your view of tabs is perpetually obscured.  And the font size on the tabs is huge so every single tab label is cut off and unreadable.  No settings to alter this.
  • You can't easily flip between sections.  I used to be able to press ctrl+right arrow to jump to the next divider section to the right.  That feature is gone, can't seem to find a replacement key combination.  And because most tabs are hidden behind other tabs you're just screwed and have to use that dumb pop-open list.
  • You can't easily flip between pages.  The old version let you disable the stupid/slow page turning effect.  The new version has no such option.  Pages turn deadly slow even on a super fast computer.
  • No right click context menu to add dividers, delete pages, etc.  One of the most awful changes is the elimination of the right click menu.  You now need to use the stupid left hand control options, which takes five clicks to accomplish what I used to be able to do in one or two.  And you have to memorize which items are behind which side menu icons, this is awful.
  • Main View (Library/etc.) is absurd.  They decided that putting a JPEG of an actual office behind the fake shelf makes for quality software.  It does not.  It's straight out of 1998.  And, again, the window doesn't launch maximized and auto zoom, so it looks like crap and is barely readable, hiding the second level titles because it's so small.
  • Import is flawed (see my comment above)
  • Android / iOS app connection is seriously stupid and un-intuitive.  Any normal human expects the following experience: Go to your tablet, open the app, see the list of libraries, open the one you want, see the cabinets, open the one you want, see the binders, open the one you want.  Browse the binder.  How hard could that be?  This idiotic version works in a completely different way.  You need to be on the desktop computer and mark a binder as "exported" and only then does it run the server required for remote access and you can only access the exported binder.  And when the remote app connects it can only see that exported binder.  Maybe you can export more than one at a time.  I didn't get that impression, but I gave up on the feature pretty quick.  Oh, and it seems to download the entire binder, rather than fetching only what it needs as it needs it, which makes some sense in terms of local performance, but a "streaming"-ish option would have been nice.

I wasted a lot of time trying to figure out how to work around Rack2-Filer Smart's buggy legacy import and I wasted a lot more time trying to figure out why the Android app wouldn't connect (nothing mentions that the server doesn't run unless a binder is "exported") and how their concept of app-desktop interaction requires this odd "export"-based strategy.

(Now, in the interests of full disclosure there may be some better way to access use this software...  it looks like both app and desktop can sync with Drop Box and Sugar Sync, which may allow you to use it without this export bullsh*t, but as I have neither a Drop Box nor a Sugar Sync account and as I'm pretty fed up with my experience thus far I'll save that investigation for another day.)

PFU sure knows how to make a bad product and that's exactly what they've delivered, a tone def mess that will now makes everything I do with their software take more time and more mouse clicks.  And it's a real pity because with a few dozen (or hundred) additional man hours they could have at least made this product no worse than their last one.

Unless you absolutely, positively must have their crappy version of a tablet connected Rack2-Filer experience I would stay away from this upgrade like the plague.  I pray it matures and they add back all the features/shortcuts they removed.

UPDATE as of 9/9/2013 (version V1.0L20)
Finaly PFU has released an update that has begun to bring previous features back!  The previous updates seemed to be nothing more than bug fixes.

I can joyously report that one of the most glaring omissions, the context menu (or right click menu) has returned!!!  Finally Rack2-Filer Smart is usable again!  It's still not where it was, before their dumb "Smart" update, but I at least now have have reason to hope the rest of the problems will be fixed as well.

Also, another petty but important fix is that the binder window now remembers its previous size and zoom level, meaning you no longer need to enlarge and zoom every single time you open a binder.  Sadly the main window still lacks this memory.

A huge improvement in this update is in the importing of scanned documents.  If you have a binder open and do a scan it will now insert the scanned documents into your current location, a vast improvement over the previous behavior which would tell you to close the binder, at which point it would insert any scanned documents at the front of the binder forcing you to awkwardly move them to their final destination.

I also noticed that page flipping seems faster, but there is still no ability to turn off the stupid page flip effect.  For the love of Pete, guys, please let us skip your stupid page flip animation!

Tabs can now be dragged to be repositioned! Maybe they could previously, but if they could it certainly wasn't obvious (it isn't obvious now, either, but I happened to discover it).

And the software is still lacking vital shortcut keys, no page flipping hotkeys (the old ctrl+right/left arrow IIRC to jump to next divider doesn't work), and ctrl+f doesn't place you in the search box.

Apparently this version also includes some sort of change in binder structure such that your binders are converted once they are opened and saved, and made incompatible with previous versions.  Not a big deal for most people, I'm sure, but something to be aware of if you're syncing data with a slightly older version you can't upgrade (e.g., in a work environment).

All in all a good day for Rack2-Filter Smart, the first day I used it when my mind wasn't filled with cursing and regrets.  Keep the improvements up guys!  Bring back ALL the functionality you took away!

^ Quinxy


My Hero #27: John Waters

watersFor some reason I've always loved director/writer John Waters.  His outspokenness, his warmth, his humor, his stories, his loyalty to his native Baltimore, he just seems like he'd be a wonderful guy to have over for dinner.  (I can't say I've ever loved his movies, though; they just didn't feel like my sort of thing, really.)

Here's an interesting video of John Waters speaking on free speech.

^ Quinxy

Filed under: Observation No Comments